Tuesday, September 28, 2010

BEIJING — China has warned the Nobel committee against awarding its coveted peace prize to a jailed Chinese dissident, the head of the Norwegian Nobel Institute said Tuesday
A Foreign Ministry spokeswoman denied that China has exerted pressure but said that choosing dissident Liu Xiaobo would go against the prize's aims.
"The person you just mentioned was sentenced to jail by Chinese judicial authorities for violating Chinese law. I think his acts are completely contrary to the aspirations of the Nobel Peace Prize," said spokeswoman Jiang Yu.
Liu, one of the country's most prominent activists, was the main author of a daring political manifesto that called for stronger human rights and an end to Communist party dominance. He was detained in 2008, and then found guilty of inciting to subvert state power. He was sentenced last December to 11 years in jail.
Geir Lundestad, secretary of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, said China's Deputy Foreign Minister Fu Ying warned that awarding the prize to Liu could harm ties between the two countries when she visited Norway in June.
Fu said that giving the Nobel to Liu would be "an unfriendly action that would have negative consequences for the relationship between Norway and China," Lundestad told The Associated Press.
Lundestad said the Nobel committee is independent and ignores pressure to influence its decisions. The peace prize winner will be announced on Oct. 8.
Liu's wife, Liu Xia, said Tuesday she thinks China will be able to exert enough pressure to stop her husband from getting the award.
"The Chinese government has money and power. There is nothing they cannot buy," she told AP Television News.
In past years, when other Chinese human rights activists have been mentioned as prize contenders, China also tried to quash their nominations.
Fu, speaking at a news conference in Beijing about a trip by Premier Wen Jiabao to Europe next week, said there is false talk about Chinese pressure every year.
"Every year, you report that China will apply pressure. And it's standard practice around this time of year. You often talk about the Chinese pressure issue," she said.
Lundestad said he told Fu that the committee is independent of the Norwegian government. He said giving the peace prize to the Dalai Lama in 1989 shows the Nobel committee doesn't respond to pressure from China. Beijing accuses the Dalai Lama of trying to undermine its control of Tibet and is sharply critical of anyone who supports him.
China has pointedly disavowed his award as well as the Nobel Literature Prize in 2000, won by Gao Xinjian, a dissident emigre writer who lives in France.
"I've had many such meetings, but this is probably at the highest level," Lundestad said. "They consider this an unfriendly action which would have negative consequences for the relationship between Norway and China.
"We, of course, reject any effort to interfere in the deliberations of the Norwegian Nobel Committee," he said.
Before his latest sentence, Liu, a former university professor, also spent 20 months in jail for joining the 1989 student-led protests in Tiananmen Square, which ended when the government called in the military — killing hundreds, perhaps thousands of demonstrators.
China routinely uses vaguely worded subversion charges to jail people it considers troublemakers. Liu's 11-year prison sentence is the harshest penalty given for inciting subversion since the crime was introduced in 1997.
In recent weeks, there have been increased public calls in support of Liu's nomination. More than 120 Chinese scholars and intellectuals have signed an open letter supporting his bid.
Last week, Czech democracy leader Vaclav Havel added his voice to the growing support for Liu, writing a public endorsement published in the International Herald Tribune.
Liu modeled the political document he wrote in 2008 after Havel's Charter 77, a political declaration that helped pave the way for the 1989 Velvet Revolution that swept the Communist regime out of the former Czechoslovakia.
Associated Press writer Karl Ritter in Stockholm contributed to this report.

US missile strike 'kills al-Qaeda chief' in Pakistan

A senior al-Qaeda leader has been killed in a suspected US drone missile strike in Pakistan, officials say.
==============================================
Pakistani security officials said Egyptian national Sheikh Fateh was killed on Saturday in North Waziristan.
Map of Pakistan showing tribal areas including North WaziristanThe officials said Sheikh Fateh took over as al-Qaeda's chief of operations for Afghanistan and Pakistan in May after al-Qaeda's number three leader Mustafa Abu al-Yazid was killed.
The US has frequently targeted al-Qaeda and the Taliban in North Waziristan.

US officials have said they cannot confirm the death of Sheikh Fateh.

He was travelling with three others when their vehicle was hit by a missile, said the Pakistani officials.

Another suspected US missile attack, on Tuesday, struck a compound in South Waziristan near the Afghan border, killing four other militants, Pakistani intelligence officials said.

News agencies say there have been at least 20 suspected US drone missile attacks in September targeting militants in Pakistan's tribal areas bordering Afghanistan.UN criticism

The raids have killed hundreds of people since January 2009 and fuelled anti-US sentiment in Pakistan.

Pakistan publicly objects to the strikes, but analysts believe such raids have the private backing of officials.

The US military routinely does not confirm drone operations, but analysts say it has the only force capable of deploying such aircraft in the region.

The Taliban and al-Qaeda have created bases in the rugged terrain, much of which lies outside government control, to launch attacks into Afghanistan.

The drone attacks have killed a number of Taliban and al-Qaeda commanders, including Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, who was killed in May.

He was considered al-Qaeda's number three leader, its head of operations for Afghanistan and Pakistan and the main conduit to Osama bin Laden.

In June, the UN's special rapporteur on extrajudicial killings, Philip Alston, had criticised targeted killings using weapons such as remote-controlled drones as posing a growing challenge to international law.

He also urged the US to reveal the number of civilians killed in
such strikes.


=============================================

Sunday, September 19, 2010



Wine is a mocker, strong drink is raging: and whosoever is deceived thereby is not wise.
Proverbs 20:1



How does wine mock? How does strong drink rage? How do they deceive men? Here are powerful figures of speech creating a short, excellent proverb against excessive drinking. If you desire to be wise, then you must be very cautious with substances that can shamefully mock you or loose your violent passions. If you arrogantly think you can easily handle alcohol without strict discipline or limits, you are a fool.

Does this proverb condemn moderate use of wine or strong drink? Absolutely not! The Lord made them both for your pleasure (31:6-7; Ps 104:14-15; Deut 14:26). The beverage of choice in the Bible was wine (Gen 14:18; II Sam 6:19; Eccl 10:19; John 2:1-11; I Tim 5:23), but it was not to be used to the excess of drunkenness (Eph 5:18; Luke 21:34).

The proverb has two beautiful metonyms. Metonymy is a figure of speech where a related thing is substituted for another. It adds beauty and force to language. The Bible is full of metonymy and other figures, so that superficial readings and primary definitions are often ludicrous, especially of proverbs (1:6). Consider these common examples:

1.     “Step on the gas” substitutes the fuel for the accelerator pedal.  We do not want anyone to stand on a gas can.  We really mean for the driver to speed up the car.
2.     “He really used his head” substitutes the location of thinking for the brain.  We don’t mean he banged his skull. We really mean he used good thinking to solve a problem.
3.     “The White House announced” substitutes the place where he lives for our President.  We do not mean that our leader’s residence actually spoke, for it is an inanimate object.  We really mean that the President gave new information to the public.

Examine the first clause, “wine is a mocker.” Wine is the fermented, alcoholic juice of the grape, and to mock someone is to ridicule or make a fool of him.  Wine will stay in a bottle or glass quite meekly. It does not do anything rude by itself. It can remain in a wine cellar for many years without ridiculing or shaming anyone. How is wine a mocker?

Wine is not a mocker itself. Wine is a metonym for drunkenness. The figure of speech substitutes a cause for the effect. The Bible says the tongue is a world of iniquity (Jas 3:6). How so? A tongue is only a muscle in your mouth. But the wrongful use of the tongue is sinful! Again, as in this category of metonymy, a cause is put for the effect.

Wine will mock you, if you drink too much of it (23:29-35).  Excessive drinking can make you drunk, which is to lose moral inhibitions, personal self-control, or even basic motor skills. Then you will make a fool of yourself. Though having the best of intentions for wisdom, you will make a joke of your own reputation. Consider what it did to Noah (Gen 9:21), Lot (Gen 19:31-36), Nabal (I Sam 25:36-38), and Elah (I Kgs 16:8-10).

Examine the second clause, “strong drink is raging.” Strong drink is a beverage from the fermentation or distillation of various substances, and rage is an outburst of violent anger. Happily for grocers and restaurant owners, beer and whiskey will stay in bottles without fighting, even for years, even on the same shelf! How does strong drink rage?

Strong drink does not rage itself. Strong drink is a metonym for drunkenness. The figure of speech substitutes a cause for the effect. The Bible says the rod gives wisdom (29:15). How so? A rod is a short stick of wood. But the prudent use of corporal punishment is a good teacher. Again, as in this category of metonymy, a cause is put for the effect.

Strong drink can lead to rage, if you drink too much of it.  Excessive drinking can make you drunk, and you may fight for no reason. The loss of ordinary inhibitions can cause you to lose your temper much faster than normal and overlook the consequences of yelling or fighting. The tongue is loosened first, then the anger, and then the fists. Stories of barroom brawls are Legion. The proverb is true!

If you drink without sober fear for these dangers of alcohol, you are a fool. Drunkenness can creep up on you and relax you into its warm folly before you realize. No wise man will drink without definite limits and conscious care to avoid drunkenness. He is committed to prudent conduct, which does not allow for even small amounts of folly (Eccl 10:1), so he will not risk his reputation by even getting close to drunkenness.

The solution is not the lie of the Temperance Movement – total abstinence and a constitutional prohibition. If that were true, then bread and meat should be despised and outlawed for their roles in gluttony! Temperance is not abstinence; it is self-discipline, which is the rule of the Christian’s life (I Cor 9:24-27). It is a shame to hear Christians ignorantly ridiculing beer or wine, while glutting themselves to obesity at a cheap buffet!

A man committed to living a holy and virtuous life for the glory of God will be careful and fearful with wine and strong drink, just as he will with pizza and pies. He does not want to sin in any area of life. And leaders are to exemplify this conservative regard for holiness, whom God has put under stricter rules for wine (31:4-5; I Tim 3:3,8; Titus 1:7).

Though Jesus of Nazareth was called a winebibber, or a drunkard, by his enemies (Matt 11:19), He was never drunk. He drank wine, and even made wine for a wedding, but He was always moderate and temperate in its use. He was the epitome of righteous sobriety. He always did those things that pleased His Father, and drunkenness does not (John 8:29; Gal 5:16-21). Remember, there are no drunkards in heaven (I Cor 6:9-10).

Saturday, September 4, 2010

What is karma?

<object width="400" height="225"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7413005&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7413005&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=1&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;autoplay=0&amp;loop=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="225"></embed></object><p><a href="http://vimeo.com/7413005">This is Karma</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/erlingo">Erling Hoveid</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>

Thursday, September 2, 2010


Professor Stephen Hawking says no God created Universe

Help
There is no place for God in theories on the creation of the Universe, the physicist and mathematician Professor Stephen Hawking has said.
He had previously argued that belief in a creator was not incompatible with science - but in a new book The Grand Design, he concludes that the Big Bang was an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics.
David Shukman reports.
(BBC news)